Files
obsidian-vault/Notes/running-shoe-brief.md
T

119 lines
7.1 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
---
date: 2026-09-13
type: note
tags: [note, shoes, running, gear, half-marathon]
---
# Running Shoe Brief
Research brief + verified shortlist for the half-marathon block. See [[Half-marathon-plan]] and [[Health/mobility]].
## The brief (pasted into Perplexity, 2026-09-13)
```
Role: footwear specialist researching one specific athlete's running shoe.
Use current 2026 models only, cite sources with links, prices in HUF.
ATHLETE — 23M, 172 cm, 84 kg, Budapest (HU market).
- Feet: flexible flat feet with overpronation. Limited ankle dorsiflexion
(knee-to-wall: 4 cm left, 6 cm right; normal 10). Tight gastroc/soleus,
bilateral calf-achilles tightness in the first 2-3 km of every run.
Left lateral ankle: peroneal (fibularis) tendon irritation.
- Current shoe: Kiprun Jogflow 190.1 — fine to 4 km, then foot numbness
(suspected lace/midfoot compression, possibly narrow last).
RUNNING — Novice. 3 runs/week, easy 6'30"-7'00"/km, avg HR 135-155,
cadence 156-168 spm, flat asphalt city routes. Current max 6.5 km,
building +1 km/week to 21.1 km on 29 Nov 2026. No speed work.
MUST-HAVES (justify each against the profile)
1. Max-cushion STABILITY daily trainer. Not motion-control, not neutral,
not plated racing.
2. Drop 8-12 mm (higher drop lowers dorsiflexion demand; no 0-4 mm).
3. Generous stack for 84 kg over 21 km, wide base.
4. Roomy toe box + midfoot volume; a 2E/wide version must exist.
5. Accepts a removable insole (possible orthotic).
6. Moderate rocker OK or desirable for limited dorsiflexion.
7. Durable for ~150 km in 3 months plus winter.
8. Budget ≤50,000 HUF preferred, ≤65,000 max; sales or prior gen fine.
OUTPUT
1. Ranked top 5, one-line reason each.
2. Table: model | version year | category | drop | stack | weight |
wide option | price HUF | Hungarian retailer with stock.
3. Best pick + runner-up, with an explicit paragraph on why it solves
the 4 cm ankle, the flat feet, and the numbness.
4. What NOT to buy for me, 3-5 items, and why.
5. How to measure my foot, EU size per model, whether to size +0.5.
6. Whether stock insoles suffice or custom orthotics are needed.
```
## Verified lab data (RunRepeat, checked 2026-09-13)
| Model | Drop (lab) | Drop (brand) | Stack heel/forefoot | Midsole |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| **Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25** | **10.2 mm** | 10.0 mm | 36.1 / 25.9 mm | 34.5 (softest) |
| **Hoka Arahi 8** | **11.3 mm** | 8.0 mm | 39.4 / 28.1 mm | 35.8 |
| ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 | 9.3 mm | 8.0 mm | 39.9 / 30.6 mm | 41.3 (firmest) |
| ASICS GT-2000 14 | 8.7 mm | 8.0 mm | 36.9 / 28.2 mm | 36.9 |
| Saucony Guide 19 | 6.0 mm | 6.0 mm | 31.4 mm forefoot | — |
- **No Adrenaline GTS 26 exists yet** (404 on the review database) → GTS 25 is the current generation.
- Perplexity's spec table checked out against these numbers. Its drop labels were accurate, including the Arahi 8's lab-vs-brand 11.3 vs 8.0 discrepancy.
- Note: the Adrenaline is the **softest** foam of the group despite being the cheapest pick; the Arahi's advantage is **stack height**, not foam softness.
## Assessment of the Perplexity output
**Correct:** measured drop figures, the Guide 19 rejection (6 mm is genuinely too low for a 4 cm knee-to-wall), the wide/2E emphasis, the "+0.5 EU for long-run swelling" call, and "stock insole first, orthotics only if pain persists 46 weeks".
**Wrong / over-claimed:**
1. Gel-Kayano 32 was ranked #3 despite being listed at 65,00075,000 HUF — above the stated budget ceiling. Should have been replaced (NB 860v14, Puma ForeverRun Nitro 2).
2. *"Why it solves your 4 cm ankle"* — no shoe creates ankle dorsiflexion. Higher drop + rocker only reduce the **demand** for it. Mobility is the only thing that moves the 4 cm.
3. The numbness fix is **unproven** — the free test (relace to skip the midfoot crossing) had not been run at time of writing.
**Worth keeping:** both top picks use *guidance* stability (Brooks GuideRails, Hoka H-Frame) rather than a hard medial post. Guidance is the right flavour here — hard posting pushes the foot laterally and adds load to the peroneals, which is exactly the irritated tissue.
## Decision
1. **Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 in wide (2E)** — best overall: highest drop of the stability trio (10.2 mm lab), softest foam, GuideRails, orthotic-friendly, wide last.
2. Runner-up **Hoka Arahi 8 wide** — if the Adrenaline feels firm or the fit is wrong; more stack (39/28), most rockered.
3. **Rejected:** Saucony Guide 19 (6 mm drop), ASICS GT-2000 14 standard width (narrow toebox re-creates the numbness), neutral max-cushion, plated racers, low-drop stability.
## Buy list — verified live 2026-09-13
| Shoe | Price | Retailer | Stock |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 wide (2E) | 55,490 Ft | futashoz.hu | In stock — sizes 42.5 / 43 / 44 / 44.5, listed "Stabil pronáló · széles lábfej" |
| Hoka Arahi 8 (gravel) | 54,390 Ft | runnie.hu | Listed |
## Orthotics — decision (2026-09-13)
Gutca has **custom-prescribed orthotic insoles at home, never used for running — walking only.**
**Decision: do not run in them — not now, not in the new shoes on day one.**
- Custom **walking** orthotics and custom **running** orthotics are different devices. A walking device is built for low-load, single-plane use, often with a firmer and more aggressive medial post, and its shell/heel cup is shaped around a walking shoe's last.
- Debuting one during a half-marathon build on an already-irritated peroneal tendon is the wrong experiment.
- **Double support:** the shortlist shoes already provide guidance stability (GuideRails / H-Frame). A posted orthotic on top can over-correct, which pushes the foot laterally and loads the peroneals — the exact tissue that flared on Sep 13.
- A firm medial post also raises the medial side, adding lateral tension at the ankle.
- An orthotic manages where the foot lands; it cannot create dorsiflexion. The 4 cm ankle is unaffected by it.
**If support is still needed after the shoe trial:** the fork is NOT "stability shoe + walking orthotic". It is a **custom sports orthotic made with the new running shoe in hand**, usually paired with a cushioned, more neutral shoe because the orthotic does the controlling. Different device, different shoe — do not pre-buy that path.
**Sequence (one variable at a time):** 23 clean runs in the new shoes stock → only then test the orthotic on a short easy run → only if flat-foot symptoms persist after 46 weeks does a running-grade orthotic earn a place.
**Bring to the fitting (2026-09-14):** ask two free questions — (a) is this device walking-grade or running-grade, (b) does it fit the Adrenaline GTS 25 / Arahi 8 without lifting the heel out of the counter. Neither answer should drive the shoe choice.
## Open items
- [ ] Measure both feet — evening, standing, heel to longest toe, use the larger, then +0.5 EU.
- [ ] **Relace the Jogflow first** (skip the midfoot crossover) — free test for the numbness cause before spending.
- [ ] Try both wide models on in a shop, ideally after a run (foot already swollen).
- [ ] Stock insole first; no orthotics until 4 weeks in the right shoe doesn't settle it.
- [ ] Needed before the next 8 km long run.
## Connected
- [[Half-marathon-plan]]
- [[Health/mobility]]